From the LVRJ:

Short sales continue in 2010

Q: It seems like we’re finally seeing more short sales take place here in Las Vegas, instead of foreclosures. This seems to be a good thing for everyone involved, even though it seems like more could be done. Can you tell me what’s happening locally and nationally to encourage short sales as an alternative to foreclosures?

– Sean F., Las Vegas

A: I appreciate your question and agree that short sales are generally better than foreclosures for our community and our housing market.

For those who don’t know, a short sale is when a property sells for less than what is owed on the mortgage.

As you may know, the short-sale process has not been working well over the past few years for buyers, sellers and others involved.

Short sales have been a cumbersome process, sometimes taking a year or more of negotiating with the lender. That’s really not acceptable for most buyers and sellers. Sellers don’t know where they stand and what the outcome will be and buyers don’t want to wait a year to move in to a home.

Like most people, I’d like to see a much more progressive, organized short-sale system that works quickly, efficiently and leads to the best possible outcome for all parties.

Fortunately, there are some recent developments in this area.

First, local housing statistics show that short sales are increasing as the number of home sales involving foreclosures are decreasing. I think that’s a good thing.

Secondly, in early December, our team at the Greater Las Vegas Association of Realtors received our first copy of the newly released guidelines and forms related to shorts sales from the U.S. Treasury Department and its new Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program.

This directive is not the final solution to this issue, but it is definitely a step in the right direction. It creates a standardization process for banks that choose to participate. I think it also cleans up a lot of the problems we have had with lengthy timelines.

HAFA is a complex program designed to simplify and streamline the use of short sales and deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure. The program does not take effect until April 5, but loan servicers may implement it before then if they meet certain requirements.

Federally backed mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are releasing their own versions of HAFA.

In any case, the National Association of Realtors played a major role in formulating many of these guidelines. I appreciate NAR helping real estate agents and homeowners who have felt ignored and even abused by their lenders.

Here are some ways this program will help homeowners and Realtors:

* It will provide a streamlined and standardized way to conduct a short-sale and deed-in-lieu.

* It uses the borrower’s financial and hardship information already collected in connection with consideration of a loan modification.

* It allows borrowers to receive pre-approved short sales terms before listing the property (including the minimum acceptable net proceeds).

* It requires borrowers to be fully released from future liability for the first mortgage debt (no cash contribution, promissory note, or deficiency judgment is allowed).

* It uses standard processes, documents, and time frames/deadlines.

* It provides financial incentives encouraging short sales. These include $1,500 for borrower relocation assistance; $1,000 for servicers to cover administrative and processing costs; and up to $1,000 for investors for allowing a total of up to $3,000 in short sale proceeds to be distributed to subordinate lien holders (on a one-for-three matching basis).

Real estate professionals and others considering a short sale can find more information at hmpadmin.com/portal/docs/hamp_servicer/sd0909.pdf. Once there, download the document entitled, Supplemental Directive 09-09, Introduction of Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives — Short Sale and Deed-in-Lieu of Foreclosure. This form contains the qualification requirements for homeowners, the required sample letters for Realtors to provide clients and the timetables required of borrowers.

I hope this helps. For more information about such issues or about the GLVAR, consult a qualified local Realtor or visit lasvegasrealtor.com.

Rick Shelton is the president of the Greater Las Vegas Association of Realtors and has worked in the real estate industry for 20 years. GLVAR has 13,500 members. To ask him a question, e-mail him at ask@glvar.org. For more information, visit lasvegasrealtor.com. Questions may be edited for space and clarity.

I remember this report coming out in 2006 showing Las Vegas as being one of the most Overvalued places in the country. There was outrage by the local Real estate Guru’s who tried to disclaim those findings with the lack of lands claims and Manhattenization of Vegas.   Now 4 years later the pendulum has swung the other way. Nearly 242 of the 330 cities are considered undervalued :

Here are the top ten most undervalued cities as compiled by  National City Corp. and IHS Global Insight:

  City , median price , 2010 valuation and 2006 valuation.

Las Vegas, Nev. $129,700 -41.4% 38%
Vero Beach, Fla. $123,300 -39.8% 54%
Merced, Calif. $102,300 -37.7% 77%
Cape Coral, Fla. $118,700 -36.8% 52%
Houma, La. $116,200 -34.6% -1%
Port St. Lucie, Fla. $115,600 -33.3% 72%
Warren, Mich. $117,500 -32.3% 15%
Vallejo, Calif. $196,900 -31.9% 53%
Modesto, Calif. $138,700 -31.8% 67%
Stockton, Calif. $145,100 -31.8% 72%

Now for the ten most Overvalued cities:

Atlantic City, N.J. $232,100 30.2% 59%
Wenatchee, Wash. $240,900 28.9% 13%
Ocean City, N.J. $294,800 26.6% 47%
Longview, Wash. $184,700 22.3% 24%
Honolulu, Hawaii $605,300 21.9% 31%
Asheville, N.C. $172,900 21.8% 24%
Portland, Ore. $267,600 20.8% 35%
Bellingham, Wash. $280,200 20.0% 43%
Corvallis, Ore. $266,400 18.9% 14%
Salem, Ore. $201,000 18.2% 25%

read article here  http://money.cnn.com/2010/01/27/real_estate/most_overvalued_metro_areas/index.htm

Check out the list for 2006:   http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/Banking/Homebuyingguide/P138237.asp

It appears that this was a very accurate analysis. Many of the cities that were overvalued in 2006 have since seen pricing massively deteriorate.

Now let see if Las Vegas can get back to Even  .  My thinking is it will be a very long time.

This is something to think about.  It is extremely important to discuss your situatiuon with a real estate attorney and CPA.  Nevada is a recourse state- Meaning that Lenders can come after borrowers if there is a shortfall from the sale of the property(there always is a short fall today). However there are many variables.

here is the Nevada statue regarding this:

NRS 40.455 Deficiency judgment: Award to judgment creditor or beneficiary of deed of trust. 1. Upon application of the judgment creditor or the beneficiary of the deed of trust within 6 months after the date of the foreclosure sale or the trustee’s sale held pursuant to NRS 107.080, respectively, and after the required hearing, the court shall award a deficiency judgment to the judgment creditor or the beneficiary of the deed of trust if it appears from the sheriff’s return or the recital of consideration in the trustee’s deed that there is a deficiency of the proceeds of the sale and a balance remaining due to the judgment creditor or the beneficiary of the deed of trust, respectively.

Basically they have 6 months to file in a foreclosure situation.

For a short sale it may be different .   Please read this very discriptive article regarding this. Full consultation is needed before anyone should make such a large decision.

 
By Les Christie, staff writer , On Wednesday February 3, 2010, 3:21 pm EST

As terrible as it is to lose your house to foreclosure, at least it’s a relief to put your biggest financial headache behind you, right?

Wrong.

Former homeowners may still be on the hook if there’s a difference between what they owed on their mortgage and what the bank could sell it for at auction. And these “deficiency judgments” are ticking time bombs that can explode years after borrowers lose their homes.

It can even happen to people who got their bank to approve them selling their home for less than it is worth.

Vanessa Corey, for example, short sold her Fredericksburg, Va., home in April 2008. She and her husband built the house in 2004, but setbacks, both personal (divorce) and professional (housing bust), made it impossible for the real estate agent to keep her home. So she negotiated the short sale and thought that was the end of it.

“My understanding was that the deficiency was negotiated away,” she said. “Then, last November, I got a letter from a lawyer telling me I owed my lender $65,000. I had to declare bankruptcy. There was no way I could pay it.”

Many homeowners are now in the same boat. And not just those who took out bigger loans than they could afford or who did so called “liar loans” where they didn’t have to verify their income.

Because of falling home prices, borrowers who always paid their mortgage but who have run into unforeseen circumstances — like unemployment or a job transfer — can no longer sell their homes for what they owe. As a result, they are being forced to short sell or foreclose and are getting caught up in deficiency judgments.

“After the banks foreclose, it’s very common now to have large deficiencies with houses not worth the balances owed,” said Don Lampe, a North Carolina real estate attorney.

Lenders mostly declined comment. Although Corey’s lender, BB&T did indicate it was pursuing more deficiency judgments.

“They follow the rise and fall of foreclosures,” said the spokeswoman, who would not discuss Corey’s account.

Can they come after you?

Whether banks can and will pursue deficiency judgments depends on many factors, including what state the borrower lives in and whether there’s a second mortgage or other liens. But if borrowers ignore the possibility of deficiencies, it could haunt them.

“Once they have a judgment, they can pursue you anywhere,” said Richard Zaretsky, a board-certified real estate attorney in West Palm Beach, Fla. “They can ask for financial records, have your wages garnished and, if you fail to respond, a judge can put you in jail.”

In the case of foreclosure, lenders can pursue deficiencies in more than 30 states, including Florida, New York and Texas, according to the U.S. Foreclosure Network, an organization of mortgage law firms.

Some states, such as California, are “non-recourse” and don’t allow deficiency judgments. But, even there, if the original loan was refinanced, some or all of it may be subject to claims.

Deficiency judgments on short sales and deeds-in-lieu can happen in many more places. In these cases, extinguishing the debt is often a matter of negotiating with the bank.

But even when lenders are willing, many borrowers may not be aware that they have to ask for release. So, if you are pursuing a short sale, be sure your attorney asks the bank to release you from any further obligation.

“People shouldn’t have a false sense of security that a deficiency judgment may not be later sought,” Zaretsky said.

He expects many will be filed over the next few years, based on the fact that banks have sold many of these accounts to collection agencies and other third parties, at discount.

“The parties who bought those notes wouldn’t have paid money for them unless they had the intention of acting,” Zaretsky said.

Ticking time bomb

What can be scary is that the judgments don’t have to be obtained immediately. Lenders or collection agencies may wait until debtors have recovered financially before they swoop in. In Florida, the bank can wait up to five years to file. Once the court grants a judgment, the lender has 20 years there to collect, with interest.

It doesn’t have to be a large amount of debt for a lender or collection agency to come after borrowers. Richard Varno and his wife short sold their Nashville home back in 2004 after he lost his job.

It wasn’t until 2008, when the second lien holder asked him for $25,000, that he realized he still was liable.

“I told them, ‘Hey, you guys released the title,’” he said. “As far as I know, I’m off the hook.”

He wasn’t. Releasing title does not necessarily end the debt. It’s complicated because of variations in state law, but, generally, a mortgage has two parts: a pledge of collateral, represented by the home, and a promise to pay off the loan.

Lenders may release property liens in order to facilitate short sales without releasing borrowers from their obligations to pay under the promissory notes. The secured debt can convert to an unsecured one after the sale.

Zaretsky had one client who was so relieved to have arranged a short sale that he signed every paper his real estate agent shoved at him, even a confession that clearly stated he still owed the debt.

“He had no idea what he was doing,” said Zaretsky. “All the lender had to do was go to court to convert the confession into a deficiency judgment.”

Lenders are also very inconsistent. One of Zaretsky’s short-sale clients was ready, willing and able to pay, but the bank did not even ask; another lender always reserves the right to pursue the deficiency.

Strategic defaults

Sometimes lenders go after borrowers walking away from their homes if they have other assets, according to Florida real estate attorney Larry Tolchinsky.

“Banks are pulling credit reports to see if it’s a strategic default,” he said. “If you’re behind on all your other payments

If borrowers have any doubts about their risks, they should seek legal advice. Or, at least, call non-profit organizations such as NeighborWorks for advice. According to Doug Robinson, a NeighborWorks spokesman, its counselors always try to negotiate away deficiencies when they facilitate short sales or deeds-in-lieu.

“We don’t favor any short-sale contracts that leave any deficiency that can be pursued,” he said.

Robinson himself knows what can happen. He paid off a deficiency after his own New Jersey house went through foreclosure 11 years ago

One of the causes of the Future “Foreclosure Tsunami”  has been touted to be the Option Arm , ALt-A products . Many of these Loans are scheduled to reset in the next 2 years.  It is the reset that was expected to make many of these loans turn start non performing.

Well it appears that we dont the resets as many are already delinquent and the numbers are increasing monthly.

The growing pain in option ARM performance is the cover of a HousingWire magazine issue out now, which studies the effect of $134bn of option ARMs expected to recast into higher monthly payments over the next two years. 

Moody’s does not expect a bottoming of house prices before Q310, with another 11% national decline likely before the worst is over. These price declines, taken with rising unemployment, housing inventory oversupply and weak demand, are pressuring performance.

On the heels of longer foreclosure and liquidation time lines “exacerbated by unsuccessful modification efforts” in 2009, loan loss severities worsened across all sectors, according to Moody’s.

Option ARMs have surpassed subprime as the sector with the steepest loss projections for securities issued from 2005 to 2007, according to Moody’s. The rating agency now expects a 20% cumulative loss on ‘05 option ARM RMBS (from 11.7% in Q109), 41% on ‘06 securitizations (from 26.7%) and 51% on ‘07 securitizations (from 29.7%).

http://www.housingwire.com/2010/01/29/option-arms-surpass-subprime-mortgages-in-loss-severity/

The percentage of  seriously delinquent loans(90+ days late) for the two goverment owned giants increased dramatically the past month and is nearly double the rate from a year ago.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s home loan delinquencies rose 4.2 per cent in October and the companies modified more mortgages under President Barack Obama’s anti-foreclosure program, the Federal Housing Finance Agency said.

The number of borrowers at least 60 days behind on home loans owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac rose to 1.65 million in October from 1.59 million in September, and has more than doubled since a year earlier, FHFA said in a report today. Delinquencies of 60 days or more as a share of mortgages serviced by the companies rose to 5.4 percent, from 5.2 per cent.

The companies modified 87,906 loans in October through Obama’s Making Home Affordable loan modification program, up from 79,950 in September, the report showed.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, seized by FHFA in September 2008 because of their losses, have been pushed by the government to help more homeowners modify or refinance their loans to more affordable terms to curb foreclosures.

McLean, Virginia-based Freddie Mac and Washington-based Fannie Mae own or guarantee about $US5.7 trillion of the $US12 trillion in US residential mortgage debt.

This is the highest rate in history,  keep in mind that most of these loans are Prime loans and not the more Toxic sub prime that initially caused the collapse. 

Also it appears that they are both going after the original lenders who wrote many of the non performing loans in the first place.

It is payback time for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on some mortgages sold to the finance companies by lenders.

Stuck with about $300 billion in loans to borrowers at least 90 days behind on payments, Fannie and Freddie have unleashed armies of auditors and other employees to sift through mortgage files for proof of underwriting flaws. The two mortgage-finance companies are flexing their muscles to force banks to repurchase loans found to contain improper documentation about a borrower’s income or outright lies.

The result: Freddie Mac required lenders to buy back $2.7 billion of loans in the first nine months of 2009, a 125% jump from $1.2 billion a year earlier. Fannie Mae won’t disclose its figure, but trade publication Inside Mortgage Finance said Fannie made $4.3 billion in loan-repurchase requests in the first nine months of 2009

Of the banks that are having to buy back the toxic assets it appears that B of A and JP Morgan are leading the way….

Next Page »